1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 174 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo has manual transmission. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Oldsmobile |
Model | Proteo | Aurora |
Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5230 mm |