1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP) has 186 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 730 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | MCC |
| Model | Proteo | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 2630 mm |
