1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2006 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 392 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2006 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Proteo | SSR |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 401 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 91.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4870 mm |