1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 560 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | Proteo | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4760 mm |
