1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 209 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Proteo | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4590 mm |