1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Volvo XC90. (235 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo has manual transmission. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Proteo | XC90 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4808 mm |