1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (310 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A6 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo has manual transmission. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | Proteo | A6 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4925 mm |
