1991 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Alfa Romeo Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
Model | Spider | RIO |
Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2570 mm |