1991 Alpina B 12 vs. 2010 Kia Optima
To start off, 2010 Kia Optima is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 358 kg more than 2010 Kia Optima.
Because 1991 Alpina B 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Alpina B 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Optima. (229 Nm). This means 1991 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alpina B 12 | 2010 Kia Optima | |
Make | Alpina | Kia |
Model | B 12 | Optima |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 229 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |