1991 Audi 100 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1991 Audi 100 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1991 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 100 (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | 100 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1991 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |