1991 Audi 100 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1991 Audi 100 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 411 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 100. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 100 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 100 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 101.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
