1991 Audi 100 vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 1991 Audi 100 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,370 cc (5 cylinders), 1991 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1981 Zastava 132.
Because 1981 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 100 | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | 100 | 132 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2370 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
