1991 Audi 100 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1991 Audi 100 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 100 (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (249 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | 100 | 102 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 249 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2160 mm |