1991 Audi 100 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 100 (226 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 186 kg more than 1991 Audi 100.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 100 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 78 L |