1991 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (115 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 143 kg more than 1991 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 100 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2460 cc | 2801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1618 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2890 mm |
