1991 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 335 kg more than 1991 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 100. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | CTS |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 5664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |