1991 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (296 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 100. (264 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 100. 2009 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 100 | 2009 Cadillac DTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | DTS |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2461 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
