1991 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (171 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 1991 Audi 100 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 100 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |