1991 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 100 (226 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 172 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi 100 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.5 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |