1991 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo GT
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Alfa Romeo GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT (237 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (226 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 129 kg more than 2010 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1991 Audi 100 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Alfa Romeo GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Alfa Romeo GT. (300 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Alfa Romeo GT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 100 | 2010 Alfa Romeo GT | |
| Make | Audi | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 100 | GT |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 93.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.8 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 63 L |
