1991 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (226 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 100 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2012 Lotus Evora.
Because 1991 Audi 100 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Lotus Evora. (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 100 | Evora |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1382 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2576 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.5 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 59 L |