1991 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1991 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 100 (226 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1991 Audi 100 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 100 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 100 (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.5 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |