1991 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (325 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1991 Audi 100. (226 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1991 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (479 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 100. (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 100. 2012 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 100 | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 100 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 479 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |