1991 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 200 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 200 (217 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 200. (315 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 200 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 84 L |