1991 Audi 80 vs. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 1991 Audi 80 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 80 (134 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 260 kg more than 1991 Audi 80.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (186 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
| Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
| Model | 80 | Tickford |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 105 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2600 mm |
