1991 Audi 80 vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1991 Audi 80 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 80 (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1960 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1991 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 50 L |