1991 Audi 80 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1991 Audi 80 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
Model | 80 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1991 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2190 mm |