1991 Audi 80 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1991 Audi 80 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 80 (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (168 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | 80 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |
