1991 Audi 80 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1991 Audi 80 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2580 mm |