1991 Audi 80 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 427 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 474 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (168 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 80 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 642 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.3:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 349 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 340 mm |