1991 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 436 kg more than 1991 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80. 2000 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 2000 Cadillac Catera | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 80 | Catera |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1746 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 13.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
