1991 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 320 kg more than 1991 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (168 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | CTS |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 68 L |