1991 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (182 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 50 L |