1991 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 80 (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 285 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (104 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Tazz.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Tazz |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 77.4 mm |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 159 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.1 seconds | 14.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 985 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |