1991 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 80 (168 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |