1991 Audi 80 vs. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 703 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80.
Because 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 618 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | 80 | Charger RT Concept |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 791 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 800 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.6 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
