1991 Audi 80 vs. 2007 Mazda 5
To start off, 2007 Mazda 5 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 80 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2007 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 2007 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | 80 | 5 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
