1991 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,361 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 85 kg more than 1991 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 50 L |