1991 Audi 80 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80.
Because 1991 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | 80 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
