1991 Audi 80 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 93 kg more than 1991 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 80 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | 3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1363 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |