1991 Audi 80 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (182 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 74 L |
