1991 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2012 Nissan Rogue is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1991 Audi 80. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 180 kg more than 1991 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 80. (167 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi 80 | 2012 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 80 | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4656 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |
