1991 Audi 90 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 90 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1991 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi 90.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi 90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi 90. (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 90 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 90 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 434 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |