1991 Audi 90 vs. 2011 Toyota iQ
To start off, 2011 Toyota iQ is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi 90 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (5 cylinders), 1991 Audi 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi 90 (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2011 Toyota iQ. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi 90 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota iQ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Audi 90 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2011 Toyota iQ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi 90 (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota iQ. (118 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1991 Audi 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota iQ.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi 90 | 2011 Toyota iQ | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 90 | iQ |
Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 1329 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3051 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2000 mm |