1991 Audi S2 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1991 Audi S2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | S2 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2580 mm |
