1991 Audi S2 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1991 Audi S2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | S2 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1991 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 467 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2580 mm |