1991 Audi S2 vs. 1996 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Korando is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1996 SsangYong Korando. (79 HP @ 4050 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 1996 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 320 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 SsangYong Korando. (150 Nm @ 2240 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 SsangYong Korando.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 1996 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | S2 | Korando |
Year Released | 1991 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4050 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2240 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1850 mm |