1991 Audi S2 vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 58 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Audi | Honda |
Model | S2 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1991 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 309 Nm | 218 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 58 L |