1991 Audi S2 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 93 kg more than 1991 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (260 Nm). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Audi S2 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | S2 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
