1991 Audi S2 vs. 2004 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 2004 Mercury Monterey is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Audi S2 (216 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Monterey. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Monterey. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 549 kg more than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercury Monterey. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Monterey (357 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Audi S2. (309 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Monterey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Audi S2 | 2004 Mercury Monterey | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | S2 | Monterey |
Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 309 Nm | 357 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1969 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.3 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.3 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 98 L |